Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Looking at a '72 E today

  1. #11
    Peter Kane

    '72 911S Targa
    Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100

  2. #12
    Ok I just drove the E. Clean car, need things here and there. The father of the seller told me the 2.4 engine is from a '73, hence the CIS setup and the engine # is

    6451598.

    Can someone decipher that for me? I feel the same way about the originality of the car without the MFI. It is a nice driver is someone does not care about all original. Also, the car was originally a gold color according to the seller and was changed to this. The asking price is $15k. I checked all structural areas and the car appeared to be very solid.

    I'll let the board know if and how I proceed. Thanks for the help.

  3. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Macroni View Post
    Thanks. The pictures of the motor in this car appears to have CIS fitted. Is retrofitting CIS an easy undertaking? Is there any benefit?
    In principle, the CIS system was preferred because of "drivability". A swap of MFI to CIS is not the most straightforward and, if I remember correctly, won't work well without some more internal changes (ie: cam, head - maybe compression?). So, most likely the whole motor was swapped - and therefore non-matching case number.

    Good luck nealf - from a fellow E9er... or did you sell it?

    oops, you posted a reply before i submitted - oh well
    Last edited by kwyjibo; 12-09-2010 at 12:28 PM. Reason: update

  4. #14
    Senior Member kentf14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,915

    Post

    Hmmm... engine #6451598... this isn't a 2.4 motor.
    You're looking at a 1975 2.7L S (USA Canada) engine. Not the correct case or fuel delivery system for the '72 chassis.

    6451598= (6 cyl), (engine type 4= S), (engine year 5= 1975), (engine #). I believe this is how it goes.
    Last edited by kentf14; 12-09-2010 at 12:58 PM.
    E911SR & RGRUPPE
    '65 911 "The Ol' Gal" (long gone)
    '73 S Coupe #306

  5. #15
    No, I still have a '70 2800CS and '72 2002Tii.

  6. #16
    I told the '72 E owner I was not interested because of the non original engine. Some have said it will obviously hurt value in the long run. What do you think the value of the car would be at this point? The body is very solid in my opinion and I think I know rust as I own a karmann built BMW as well as a BMW 2002 Tii. The current asking price is around $13k. Even with no engine this is a fair price, no? I see no bodywork that needs to be completed. I'll post pics tomorrow.

    Thanks for the opinions in advance.

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Corvallis, OR
    Posts
    2,564
    Pics would help to see what else might be missing but with a color change and non matching motor I'd say walking away might be the best choice. If the body is really 100% straight and rust free then 13K is in the ball park but you need to ask yourself if you like red or gold.
    72S, 72T now ST

Similar Threads

  1. What Did You Do to Your 911 Today?
    By Stretch32 in forum General Info
    Replies: 2953
    Last Post: 12-12-2023, 02:20 PM
  2. My COA came today....
    By C.Plavan in forum General Info
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-29-2011, 06:19 PM
  3. Today I am a happy man!
    By tennster in forum Other Porsche Passions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-20-2010, 12:10 AM
  4. Where is this car today?
    By 72targa in forum General Info
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 12-10-2006, 06:07 AM
  5. They came today!!!
    By jashford in forum General Info
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-29-2005, 08:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.