Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Mahle P&C set for 2.5l type 911/70 engine with 10.3:1 CR?

  1. #1
    Senior Member matteo68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    Wootton, Woodstock, UK
    Posts
    289

    Mahle P&C set for 2.5l type 911/70 engine with 10.3:1 CR?

    My 2.5 SR engine is being built as an accurate type 911/70 long stroke (2,492 cc) and we are about to complete the bottom end with a 70.4 mm std/std crank and as a next step need to source the correct 86.7 mm diameter P&C set with 10.3:1 compression ratio as stated in the table in ‘Information…for Sports Purposes’ 2 Ed:

    Name:  1A9B7384-4B76-4566-9201-E7922B4BE90C.jpg
Views: 375
Size:  48.0 KB

    Whilst I would very much like to use a Mahle P&C set, I note their 2022 Porsche Application Guide states that the PS86-002 set has a CR of only 9.3:1 which would be too low for my engine, whereas their short-stroke 2.5l PS82-002N set does have a 10.3:1 CR in order to achieve the 275 bhp this type 911/73 engine achieves.

    The Porsche Spare Parts list of Nov'71 for the 911 S MY72 (competition type) specifies the pistons & cylinders for the racing engine with a part number of 911.103.925.71 and a diameter of 86.8mm (which I think must be a typo as 86.7 mm diameter is correct and stated in the Sports Purposes document) - see attached extract:

    Name:  D7FCD2DF-AB5C-4728-A537-2C703B45A839.jpg
Views: 377
Size:  55.8 KB

    I have searched all over the internet but cannot find any reference to this part number anywhere apart from in the Spares List.

    Can anyone (gled49, longballa, letsrollbabe, boyer73S, erniew?) advise what I should do in the circumstances to achieve the correct CR please? Do I need to get Mahle to make a custom set and if so, where would I get all the data they require when I don’t even know what the deck clearance should be to achieve 10.3:1!

    In the meantime I am searching through all the various ESR ST threads at the moment and have found this really useful post from Gib - anyone have a spare NOS set of original Mahle 86.7s by any chance?!! (not expecting any replies to that tbh!)

    Name:  CE90A0A5-779D-42DF-B6CB-4B60519840EB.jpg
Views: 380
Size:  70.5 KB
    ESR #4098
    ‘72 T Coupe (donor car for M491 2.5 SR)
    '72 S Coupe (2-owner tangerine unicorn)

  2. #2
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,355
    The one I did used real factory twin plug heads at 67cc, with a 1.1mm deck it was 10:1. It used original 906 cams and HBF injection. Factory HP rating was not achieved. The cylinders are bore in and use 908 base gaskets. G

  3. #3
    Senior Member matteo68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    Wootton, Woodstock, UK
    Posts
    289
    Thanks Gordon.

    We've just found these which would appear to be exactly what we're looking for: https://msroadrace.com/index.php?rou...product_id=435

    Matt
    ESR #4098
    ‘72 T Coupe (donor car for M491 2.5 SR)
    '72 S Coupe (2-owner tangerine unicorn)

  4. #4
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,355
    When I worked with Jerry Woods, he suggested comp ratios were figured with “0” deck.

  5. #5
    Senior Member matteo68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    Wootton, Woodstock, UK
    Posts
    289
    That’s really helpful too Gordon and makes sense: the guy at Mahle Motorsports said: “For this part (PS86-002) to be 10.3 to 1 maybe 70.5cc isn't the right chamber volume, maybe they're running tighter than 1mm deck clearance, or a combination of both? These have a dome volume of 25.9cc if that helps any.”
    ESR #4098
    ‘72 T Coupe (donor car for M491 2.5 SR)
    '72 S Coupe (2-owner tangerine unicorn)

  6. #6
    Senior Member 68S_SK2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    572
    Hi Matt,
    You could ask Woessner in Germany. They are very well known maybe even better than Mahle.
    I think your dimension is not listed, but I'm sure they can machine them.

    https://www.woessner-kolben.de/produkte/auto/

    BR
    Claudius

  7. #7
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,355
    At 70.5 & 26 dome it will be tough to get there. We were 67 & 27 dome.

  8. #8
    Senior Member matteo68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    Wootton, Woodstock, UK
    Posts
    289
    Thanks Claudius, a good suggestion but hopefully we’ll be able to get the ones from MSRoadRace shipped to the UK without too much difficulty. We just need to find out if the cylinders are Nikasil coated like the originals apparently were.

    Cheers
    Matt
    ESR #4098
    ‘72 T Coupe (donor car for M491 2.5 SR)
    '72 S Coupe (2-owner tangerine unicorn)

  9. #9
    Senior Member matteo68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    Wootton, Woodstock, UK
    Posts
    289
    Just had this confirmed by Jason Griffin at Mahle:

    Name:  7D2BC002-18C1-473C-980E-DF142402407F.jpg
Views: 333
Size:  40.6 KB

    Very happy now!
    ESR #4098
    ‘72 T Coupe (donor car for M491 2.5 SR)
    '72 S Coupe (2-owner tangerine unicorn)

  10. #10
    A photo of the type P/C…
    Attached Images Attached Images    
    Ernie W
    member of Early 911S Registry

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.