Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 47

Thread: early 911 starter engine (motor)

  1. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Breazeale View Post
    Allen

    So the nose piece is actually a separate part? Used as an adaptor to use a starter with a non supported bendix (like a 356) in a transmission without a bendix support (like a 356)? Very interesting.

    Regards

    Jim
    Exactly Jim! But, I think the other versions, like the backwards turning one, have an integrated, i.e. can't remove it. So it could have a completely self-supporting Bendix,. Thanks.

    -Allen-
    Last edited by Allen Henderson; 02-25-2016 at 09:27 AM.

  2. #32
    Bosch date code 410 = October, 1964

    Quote Originally Posted by P-CarLover View Post
    Here are pictures of the starter I have, as I mentioned this came to us with 901 transmission #100114.

    Attachment 369390
    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

  3. #33
    Those early starter motors required a longer mounting stud on the transmission case.
    The Parts Catalog lists two lengths of mounting stud, 10x30 and 10x22, the numbers 30 and 22 being their exposed lengths in mm, not their overall lengths.

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

  4. #34
    Restoration newbie.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    1,484
    Quote Originally Posted by P-CarLover View Post
    I knew I set it aside for a reason
    What sort of value would you place on it?
    Speaking of the transmission, are we way off base with the price? Have nothing to compare to other then the $29,500 one on Ebay Everyone who wants it just says, "oh its just a core worth like $1500". Some how I just can't believe that.
    THANKS!
    John
    Everybody is pretty much right, you're asking 10x the going rate for that box. The only difference between your transmission and another 901/0 box is the serial number. I understand it's early but unless some rube has the chassis that matches it will still be incorrect. Is it rare? Yes. Is it worth 10x what an identical gearbox manufactured a few months later is worth? Not so much.

    andy
    67S in pieces
    EarlyS: 1358
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  5. #35
    So the difference between a 64,65 and a 66 911 is just a serial number, but yet a 64 is worth $500K+, a 65 911 is worth $250K while a 66 will bring a fraction of that, so what is your point exactly?

    There are actually quite a few unique factors to that gearbox and if you are putting together a $500K car then spending $15K on a correct original transmission for the car is pretty reasonable. It's called supply and demand, look it up.

    Edit: Sorry for de-railing this thread, if you wish to comment further on the transmission do so on the for sale thread. Thanks.
    Last edited by P-CarLover; 02-25-2016 at 04:32 PM.

  6. #36
    Restoration newbie.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    1,484
    Quote Originally Posted by P-CarLover View Post
    So the difference between a 64,65 and a 66 911 is just a serial number, but yet a 64 is worth $500K+, a 65 911 is worth $250K while a 66 will bring a fraction of that, so what is your point exactly?

    There are actually quite a few unique factors to that gearbox and if you are putting together a $500K car then spending $15K on a correct original transmission for the car is pretty reasonable. It's called supply and demand, look it up.
    Yep, supply and demand, your problem is demand. There's either 1 or zero people on the planet who might pay your ask for that transaxle. That one person is the owner of the matching chassis, assuming it still exists and they aren't offended at the prospect of paying way more than the box is worth to make their car matching.

    Good luck with the sale.

    andy
    67S in pieces
    EarlyS: 1358
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  7. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by ajwans View Post
    Yep, supply and demand, your problem is demand. There's either 1 or zero people on the planet who might pay your ask for that transaxle. That one person is the owner of the matching chassis, assuming it still exists and they aren't offended at the prospect of paying way more than the box is worth to make their car matching.

    Good luck with the sale.

    andy
    I am w/ Andy on this one.

    If your 64 had been earlier it would have unique (casting / function) details and such a box could have raised $15K.

    Your starter is much rarer than an early numbered box and may be you should throw it in the deal in order to sell the box for $15K.

    BTW what I personally like on a 64 and early 65 vs later cars is the flat panel, 6 piece dash and tall grill.

    Just my $.02
    searching for engine (case) 903742

  8. #38
    Ok sounds like a deal, buy the transmission and you get the starter for free.

  9. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by P-CarLover View Post
    Ok sounds like a deal, buy the transmission and you get the starter for free.
    I am all set but in all seriousness do I think that the combination is more interesting. May be you should edit your FS add for the transmission.

    Good luck w/ the sale.

    Richard
    searching for engine (case) 903742

  10. #40
    Senior Member pss's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,165
    Yep, the internet is like a brick wall. It is possible to write your opinion on it for sure. Easy to get carried away though

    Some feel I need to buy a box or maybe car or what was the point?? Where was I ........oh yes, I was looking for a starter. Txs.
    member 2971 Jacques
    911 March 1965
    912 April 1965
    911 May 1965
    964 RS clone (one of many)
    964 Targa original Dutch police car (one of 45)
    964 Turbo 3.6 (one of 1450)
    993 S Vesuvio (one of 250)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.